![]() This of course provoked a denial from philosophers for whom consciousness and mental were identical and they could never conceive of an absurdity such as an unconscious mental state. Psychoanalysis regarded everything mental being in the first place unconscious, and thus for them, consciousness might be present or absent. Is the Freudian unconscious relevant in the light of modern day consciousness? This paper looks at the connection between Freudian theory/concepts and modern day conceptualisation of consciousness. The special characteristics of unconscious states including their relations to states described by modern psychology and the relevance of the Freudian unconsciousness to questions concerning the divided or multiple self is equally important. Much to be learned in relation to issues in contemporary philosophy of mind, moral and social theory. There is still much to be learned from Freud (Neu, 1991). Although one might wish to reject or argue with some Freudian interpretations and theories, his writings and insights are too compelling to simply turn away. He often made sense of the ranges that were neglected or misunderstood. He gave us a new and powerful way to think about and investigate human thought, action and interaction. Freud’s influence continues to be enormous and pervasive. Auden, In Memory of Sigmund Freud) (Auden and Mendelson, 1991)ĭespite distorted understandings of Freudian views and despite periodic waves of Freud bashing, Auden’s assessment remains essentially correct. “If often he was wrong and, at times absurd, to us he is no more a person now but a whole climate of opinion under whom we conduct our different lives…” ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |